{"id":16423,"date":"2025-04-27T00:13:00","date_gmt":"2025-04-26T16:13:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/?p=16423"},"modified":"2025-05-02T12:17:23","modified_gmt":"2025-05-02T04:17:23","slug":"php20-rice-unli-lies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/php20-rice-unli-lies\/","title":{"rendered":"Php20 rice, unli lies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pres. Ferdinand Marcos Jr recently doubled down on the \u201cPhp20\/kilo rice\u201d campaign fantasy and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pna.gov.ph\/articles\/1248604\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">claimed<\/a>&nbsp;that \u201cWe\u2019re starting to make it happen.\u201d The political stunt is deeply cynical.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For one thing, the president is claiming to do something for hungry Filipinos that he promised long ago but hasn\u2019t really done anything about since he took office.&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sws.org.ph\/swsmain\/generalArtclSrchPage\/?page=1&amp;srchprm=&amp;arttyp=3&amp;stdtrng=&amp;endtrng=&amp;swityp=3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Hunger<\/a>&nbsp;has more than doubled since Pres. Marcos took office \u2013 from 2.9 million or 11.6% of families in June 2022 to some 7.5 million or 27.2% as of March 2025, according to the Social Weather Stations (SWS).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If anything, he\u2019s done the opposite. For instance, the president hyped increasing funding for the Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund (RCEF) by Php20 billion annually after signing&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pna.gov.ph\/index.php\/articles\/1239527\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Republic Act 12078<\/a>&nbsp;on December 9, 2024. But then, three weeks later, he vetoed what was even just an additional Php5 billion for RCEF \u2013 apparently to make room for pork barrel in the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pna.gov.ph\/index.php\/articles\/1240731\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">2025 budget<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For another, the president and his compliant agriculture secretary are repeating the outrageous claim even if they really truly know that the chances of Filipino families really truly getting rice at Php20\/kilo are really truly zero. Saying something that one knows is untrue is usually called lying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The mechanics aren\u2019t even very clear yet \u2013 which tends to support the view that this is a hastily drawn up scheme responding to recent Pulse Asia survey results that the president\u2019s approval rating is dramatically&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/pulseasia.ph\/updates\/march-2025-nationwide-survey-on-the-performance-and-trustworthiness-ratings-of-the-top-national-government-officials\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">declining<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It seems that the main measure is that the government somehow subsidizes the gap between the promised Php20\/kilo and the prevailing&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/psa.gov.ph\/statistics\/price-situationer\/selected-agri-commodities\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Php45<\/a>\/kilo average retail price of rice, according to the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA). For some reason, the agriculture department claims a much&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/pia.gov.ph\/da-to-roll-out-p20-rice-program-in-visayas\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">lower<\/a>&nbsp;\u201ccurrent market price of Php32 to Php33 per kilo.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The price difference, according to the agriculture secretary, will be shouldered by the national government and local government units. The program set to be launched in the Visayas will sell at most 10 kilos per week per indigent or low-income family. The budget for the program is estimated at&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/pia.gov.ph\/da-to-roll-out-p20-rice-program-in-visayas\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Php3.5-4.5 billion<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Let\u2019s look at the maths.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Visayas has 900,886 poor families, according to the social welfare department\u2019s latest Listahanan 3. If the budget is just for the Visayas, it will be able to lower the price of rice for these poor families for about 20 weeks or five months. That would leave over 4.1 million Visayan families still paying the normal expensive price for rice though.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Listahanan 3 identifies 5.6 million poor families nationwide. If the \u201cPhp4.5 billion\u201d budget is for all of them they can be subsidized for a little over three weeks (about 22 days).&nbsp; But it\u2019s not as if they\u2019re the only needy Filipino families.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) reported some 20.1 million household or nearly three-fourths of all households (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bsp.gov.ph\/Lists\/Consumer%20Expectation%20Report\/Attachments\/23\/CES_4qtr2024.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">74.4%<\/a>) as not having any savings. The \u201cPhp4.5 billion\u201d budget enables Php20\/kilo rice for just a little over six days or less than a week. Even less once logistical expenses are taken into consideration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">None of this is anywhere near the \u201cPhp20\/kilo\u201d rice that the president promised while campaigning. What would have been more truthful is if he\u2019d instead promised \u201cPhp20\/kilo rice for all 27 million Filipino families for five days\u201d or \u201cPhp20\/kilo rice but only for 5.6 million poor families and only for three weeks\u201d \u2013 but then this truth is so much duller than the fiction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Is the plan to sell the National Food Authority\u2019s (NFA) 358,000 MT buffer stock? Even if eventually replenished, this compromises the NFA\u2019s food security purposes at a time when it\u2019s become even more important given the US-driven uncertainties in the global trading system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The government\u2019s latest rice program is clearly just a politically-motivated gimmick. It is just like all the other cynically superficial and tokenistic measures it has been rolling out \u2013 maximum suggested retail price, Kadiwa program, food stamps, and declaring a food security emergency. Rice and other food prices can be sustainably lowered but only with a long-term strategy of steady protection and subsidies for small farmers and Filipino agriculture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pres. Marcos\u2019 latest political stunt to try and gain public approval is just going to backfire on him because, once again, he\u2019s promising something that he clearly doesn\u2019t have the understanding or commitment to deliver. ###<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>COMMENTARY<\/p>\n<p>The president is claiming to do something for hungry Filipinos that he promised long ago but hasn\u2019t really done anything about since he took office.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":16424,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"single-nosidebarbanner.php","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2050,3],"tags":[1452,257,2973,3848,116,3847,159,3388,3849,3850,1903],"class_list":["post-16423","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-commentary-features","category-features","tag-hunger","tag-joblessness","tag-marcos-administration","tag-no-savings","tag-philippine-economy","tag-php20-per-kilo-rice","tag-poverty","tag-price-of-rice","tag-rcef","tag-rice-competetive-enhancement-fund","tag-rice-tariffication-law","wpautop"],"acf":[],"publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-07-23 19:03:53","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category","extraData":[]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16423","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16423"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16423\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16478,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16423\/revisions\/16478"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16424"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16423"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16423"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16423"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}