{"id":9780,"date":"2020-06-06T11:55:00","date_gmt":"2020-06-06T03:55:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/?p=9780"},"modified":"2020-06-06T12:20:37","modified_gmt":"2020-06-06T04:20:37","slug":"covid-19-how-prepared-are-we-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/covid-19-how-prepared-are-we-now\/","title":{"rendered":"COVID-19: How prepared are we now?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After two and a half months of\nlockdown, the public healthcare system remains unequipped with the necessary\nweapons to fight COVID-19. The Philippine government imposed a total lockdown\ndubbed as the \u201cenhanced community quarantine\u201d or ECQ last March 16 after there\nwas a confirmed local transmission of COVID-19. The announcement was totally\nunprecedented and ill-planned. It caused a lot of confusion among Filipino\ncitizens and even among implementing agencies and local government units. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The basis for this lockdown was to\nstall the spread of the coronavirus while preparing the needed facilities to\nfight the disease. Ideally it should be the government\u2019s opportunity to equip\nthe health system with enough facilities and health workers to brace for the\nsecond wave of COVID cases. But has the lockdown been truly beneficial in\npreparing the public health system for the worst of the pandemic that is yet to\ncome?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Under-capacitated<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to a <a href=\"https:\/\/pidswebs.pids.gov.ph\/CDN\/PUBLICATIONS\/pidsdps2015.pdf\">Philippine\nInstitute for Development Studies (PIDS) discussion paper<\/a> released last\nApril, the country will need a total of 182,000 hospital beds during the peak\nmonth in the best case scenario. But as per a recent <a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1hqstS_1Ik-J6jLTLpfGUa5IB3hfsNt5I\/view\">Department\nof Health (DOH) situationer<\/a>, the overall bed capacity of the public health system\nis only 13,565 which only covers about 7% of the total hospital beds needed.\nCurrently, there are only 2,005 mechanical ventilators available, very far from\nthe estimated 30,000 ventilators that the country will need during the peak of\nthe disease.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>When it comes to the health\nworkforce needed, the country will require a total of 88,000 doctors and\n118,000 nurses for COVID patients. There are just 52,000 doctors and 351,000\nnurses available for all diseases and care, and we cannot of course assume that\nthey should be dedicated to only attend to COVID patients. Again, these\nestimates are just for the best-case scenario which will only happen if 70% of\ntotal symptomatic cases will be isolated. This seems unattainable with the\ncurrent status or practical non-existence of mass testing and contact tracing. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Unfortunately, the government has failed\nto maximize its imposed lockdown to fill the existing gaps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Mass\narrests instead of mass testing<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Instead of acquiring the necessary\nequipment and building additional facilities, the government has focused more\non restricting people\u2019s mobility and using military forces in enforcing the\nquarantine. The government has not only been slow \u2013 it has also made poor\ndecisions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Instead of prioritizing mass\ntesting to identify and isolate affected individuals and infusing funds for\nthis, government chose to fully restrict economic activity, which has disrupted\npeople\u2019s livelihoods and incomes. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There was even a time when there\nwere more individuals apprehended and arrested than tested for COVID. According\nto the Coalition for People\u2019s Right to Health, as of May 3 there were a total\nof 158,353 quarantine violators, with 42,138 arrests made. Meanwhile, there were\nonly 106,520 unique individuals and 120,736 tests conducted overall. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Plans for checkpoints are more precise\nthan plans for mass testing. There are more checkpoints than testing centers.\nAs of May 29, there were 4,398 quarantine <a href=\"https:\/\/news.mb.com.ph\/2020\/05\/29\/more-mobile-checkpoints-in-metro-manila-under-gcq\/\">checkpoints<\/a>\nand 115 dedicated checkpoints and the police are still planning to add more. As\nof May 31, there were only 38 licensed reverse transcription-polymeraise chain\nreaction (RT-PCR) laboratories and 11 licensed GeneExpert laboratories, while\n130 laboratory applications are still waiting for approval. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Now as\neconomic activity is slowly opening after a long period of lockdown, citizens\u2019\ncall for free mass testing has become even louder. But instead of addressing\nthis, the government has only played with semantics \u2013 clarifying that it would only\nconduct \u201cexpanded targeted testing\u201d instead of mass testing because it does not\nhave enough capacity for testing the WHOLE Philippine population. This has sparked\nfurther outrage among the Filipino people hence the louder call for free mass\ntesting and government accountability. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While government is busy with its vocabulary\nenrichment games, the Makabayan bloc in the House of Representatives (HOR) filed\non May 28 House Bill 6848, the \u201cFree Mass Testing Act of 2020\u201d. But the\nsuper-majority Duterte-allied HOR has prioritized the approval of the\nAnti-Terrorism Bill instead of more COVID-urgent legislative proposals. Apparently,\nthe Duterte government is more concerned now with its critics than the\npandemic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Forgetting\nthe frontliners<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The government has prioritized arming\nthe military and weaponizing laws to target activists and critics who have\ngrown disgusted with the lack of government response to COVID. And it has\npractically neglected the medical frontliners. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Protecting health workers and\nnon-medical frontliners is another area of failure. Massive shortages in personal\nprotective equipment, mask, and other equipment and facilities at the beginning\nof the outbreak resulted in a huge number of our frontliners being infected by\nthe disease. But now that there are allegedly enough protective covers, the\nslow bureaucratic process of distribution (plus a hint of corruption) is unjustly\naffecting our frontline medical workers. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As per latest DOH report, there\nare 2,606 health workers infected by the disease with 1,172 active cases and a\ntotal of 32 casualties. Recent reports even have it that some health workers\nhave not received any of the mandated aid to them, and relatives of health\nworkers who died of COVID have not received the death benefits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A mere \u2018thank you\u2019 will not help\nour frontliners. The government should do aggressive mass testing \u2013 this is also\nfor the sake of our frontliners. Our health workers should be the last ones\nstanding, but what is happening now is without protection they are the ones\nbeing sacrificed in the fight. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Ready\nor not?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The government declaration of\nlockdown was premature \u2013 it lacked a clear plan on how it really intended to\ncontain the spread of coronavirus. It also lacked foresight on how to address\nthe socioeconomic impact of such lockdown on the people. Now, businesses all\nover the country are pressuring the government to lift the ECQ since the two\nmonths of lockdown have entailed huge profit losses. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But more importantly, the poor cannot\nafford the lockdown anymore. The people should not choose between dying from\nhunger and dying from the virus \u2013 the government must give everything for the\npeople to live. But the government has not even given enough support. The poor are\ngoing hungry, they have already endured too much, and their rumbling stomachs\nare becoming hard to ignore. It is a rumbling social unrest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On the other hand, the health system was already weak before COVID, but the pandemic only bared how bad the system is. And now that there is urgency to improve it, the government still sticks to its sick policy of relying on the private health system and defaulting on state responsibility. Government action has not only been slow and meager, but the bureaucracy has not prioritized what the people need. And now that the majority of the Filipino working class are getting back to work, government has no clear plan and support on how the workers and low-income earners shall be protected from COVID. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The activists are right after all \u2013 we need mass testing, and more so now that economic activity has resumed. It is government responsibility to isolate and treat infected individuals and let the rest of the healthy people be productive. Government should remove the undue stress and anxiety that this disease is giving to the population, let them work with peace of mind that they are fully protected from this disease and from the harsh socioeconomic impact of the lockdown. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BIRD FEED<\/p>\n<p>After two and a half months of lockdown, the public healthcare system remains unequipped with the necessary weapons to fight COVID-19. <\/p>","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":9783,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":"","_expiration-date-status":"saved","_expiration-date":0,"_expiration-date-type":"","_expiration-date-categories":[],"_expiration-date-options":[]},"categories":[2048,2049],"tags":[2199,2218,347,2225,353,2284,555],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9780"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9780"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9780\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9786,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9780\/revisions\/9786"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9783"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9780"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9780"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ibon.org\/tl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9780"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}